Further to the post in May this year regarding P St J Smart’s article which contended that an Australian court should not enforce a “judgment on a judgment”, Ian Molloy has written a follow-up article in the latest Australian Law Journal (2007 vol 81, p 760) highlighting two cases which adopt this view. The cases are the Supreme Court of New South Wales decision in Taylor v McGiffen (unreported, Supreme Court of New South Wales, 15 July 1985) and the National Court of Justice of Papua New Guinea decision in WorkCover Authority (NSW) v Placer (PNG) Exploration Ltd [2006] PGNC 47. Ian Molloy’s article is available on the internet to Lawbook Online subscribers.
-
CONTENT
-
Email Updates
-
Resources
Recent Posts
- The AG Opinion in West Tankers
- Conference: Arbitration and EC Law
- Third Issue of 2008's Journal du Droit International
- Immunity of Foreign Central Banks Assets in Belgium
- Reference on Art. 5 No. 1 (b) Brussels I: Distinction between sales of goods/provision of services and determination of place of performance regarding contract involving carriage of the goods
Archives
Categories
RECENT COMMENTS
- Choice of law, forum non conveniens and asbestos in the Victorian Court of Appeal 1
Thenseles - The AG Opinion in West Tankers 5
Adrian Briggs, Antonin I. Pribetic, Gilles Cuniberti, Martin George [...] - Submission of Abstracts for the 2009 NYU Conference 2
Ayorinde Olabode, William Leung - India to Join Hague Conference to Protect a Married Woman's Rights? 4
anitha, Rahul, Chandra, Rakesh - Jurisdiction over Foreign Defendants and Jurisdiction over Foreign Land: One Question or Two? 2
Antonin I. Pribetic, Antonin I. Pribetic
- Choice of law, forum non conveniens and asbestos in the Victorian Court of Appeal 1
Post a Comment