<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: German Annotation to the ECJ&#8217;s Opinion 1/03 - Competence of the EC to conclude the new Lugano Convention</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.conflictoflaws.net/index.php?year=2006&#038;category_name=articles&#038;name=german-annotation-to-the-ecjs-opinion-103-competence-of-the-ec-to-conclude-the-new-lugano-convention&#038;feed=feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.conflictoflaws.net/2006/articles/german-annotation-to-the-ecjs-opinion-103-competence-of-the-ec-to-conclude-the-new-lugano-convention/</link>
	<description>News and Views in Private International Law</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2008 04:24:28 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.1</generator>
	</channel>
</rss>
